Wikipedia Alleged to Have Been Weaponized by US Intelligence for Information Warfare

Wikipedia Alleged to Have Been Weaponized by US Intelligence for Information Warfare

Larry Sanger, the co-founder of Wikipedia, has alleged that the popular online encyclopedia is being exploited by the US liberal establishment and intelligence community for "information warfare." In a candid interview with journalist Glenn Greenwald, Sanger expressed grave concerns about the manipulation of information on Wikipedia, turning it into a tool of control in the hands of left/liberal factions, including the CIA, FBI, and other US intelligence agencies.

The allegations of covert interference on Wikipedia by intelligence agencies date back to as early as 2008. Reports have surfaced suggesting that CIA and FBI computers were used to edit Wikipedia articles, raising serious questions about the continued extent of such interference. This revelation came to light thanks to the efforts of a programming student named Virgil Griffith, who developed a groundbreaking tool called WikiScanner to trace the origins of edits. The tool implicated several large corporations and government agencies, revealing attempts to scrub incriminating information from the site.

The CIA's involvement in editing Wikipedia entries took a sinister turn when it was discovered that casualty counts from the Iraq War were being removed, and entries on prominent figures such as Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and China's nuclear program were being edited. Such actions indicate a concerted effort by intelligence agencies to manipulate narratives and control the dissemination of information on the platform.

Sanger has gone on record accusing these intelligence agencies of not only directly editing Wikipedia content but also resorting to more covert tactics. According to him, influential individuals are being paid off to promote specific agendas or even recruited and cultivated within the intelligence community to surreptitiously manipulate Wikipedia articles to serve their interests.

The co-founder stressed the significance of the internet in the modern era, pointing out that intelligence and information warfare have largely shifted online, with platforms like Wikipedia being prime targets.

These allegations follow a series of other high profile instances of tech companies' collusion with the intelligence community. Earlier this year, entrepreneur Elon Musk released documents that exposed collusion between Twitter executives and the FBI, revealing content removal and the provision of assistance in US military online influence campaigns.

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta (formerly Facebook), has also faced criticism after admitting that his platform censored damaging information about President Joe Biden's 2020 election campaign at the FBI's request. These incidents have sparked a larger conversation about the role of social media giants in curating public discourse and the potential for them to be influenced by government entities.

As these revelations continue to unfold, the public is left to grapple with the implications of weaponized information and the growing challenge of distinguishing between authentic content and covertly manipulated narratives. The question of trust and transparency in online platforms and information dissemination has never been more critical.

Experts in the field stress the importance of vigilance and critical thinking while consuming information from digital sources. Fact checking and cross referencing are essential to ensuring that users are not unwittingly subjected to manipulative content designed to serve hidden agendas.

While the future of Wikipedia and other online platforms remains uncertain, it is clear that the revelations made by Larry Sanger have opened a Pandora's box of concerns about the potential for information warfare to infiltrate and undermine the very foundations of open knowledge and public discourse.

Back to blog

Leave a comment